In a move that has sparked global condemnation, Ghana’s parliament unanimously approved the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Act on Wednesday, a controversial anti-homosexuality bill that not only criminalizes LGBTQ relationships but also targets individuals supporting LGBTQ rights.
The bill, introduced in 2021, reflects a broader trend in African nations grappling with issues related to same-sex activity, often rooted in colonial-era laws. Despite the prevalence of such laws, recent bills and proposals across the continent have sought to clarify and, in some cases, strengthen these prohibitions.
Sam George, one of the main sponsors of the bill, announced the long-awaited passage on social media, declaring, “After three long years, we have finally passed the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Act,” on Twitter.
However, the international response has been swift and critical. A recent CNN investigation uncovered alleged links between a U.S. nonprofit and the formulation of the anti-LGBTQ laws in Ghana. Although the group denied any involvement, the controversy further fueled concerns about external influence on the legislation.
Before becoming law, the bill requires approval from Ghana’s president. The United Nations human rights chief, Volker Türk, expressed profound disturbance over parliament’s decision and urged the government not to sign it into law. Türk highlighted the broadened scope of criminal sanctions against LGBTQ+ individuals and their allies.
UNAIDS executive director Winnie Byanyima warned that if the bill becomes law, it would adversely affect everyone, hindering Ghana’s fight against HIV and AIDS. Byanyima emphasized the potential negative impacts on free speech, freedom of movement, freedom of association, and access to life-saving services.
The United States State Department joined the international chorus of disapproval, expressing deep concern over the bill’s passage. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller stated that the legislation would threaten constitutionally protected freedoms of speech, press, and assembly for all Ghanaians.
The U.S. government reiterated the potential repercussions on public health, media, civic spaces, and the economy. International business coalitions have already raised alarms, indicating that discriminatory laws in Ghana could harm business and economic growth in the country.
As the international community watches closely, pressure mounts on Ghana’s leadership to reconsider the implications of the bill on human rights, public health, and economic well-being. The controversial legislation stands at the crossroads of tradition, international relations, and the ongoing struggle for LGBTQ+ rights in Africa.